The era of common sense is dead.
The left has used any and every hint of Russia as validation of their baseless theory of collusion. Problem is, Democrats are missing the mark in the attempt to prove their case.
If they think that the meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya is their ticket to impeachment hearings, they’re making a big mistake, one that could end up helping Trump himself.
A big problem Dems will face is simply the fact that no info was transferred, and that she was not part of the Russian government at the time of the meeting.
Sure, Democrats can say that this is the closest they’ve gotten to “collusion”, but no real colluding occurred.
Collusion or Democratic Plant?
President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., agreed to meet with someone he believed to be a “Russian government attorney” last summer.
This was after he received an email offering him “very high level and sensitive information” that would “incriminate” Hillary Clinton.
Should Trump Jr. have fallen for the bait? No.
But he did the right thing in releasing the emails and being completely transparent about the ordeal. Something Hillary Clinton knows nothing about!
As usual, the left is still running with their “evidence of Russian collusion” rhetoric. But is this the real story, or is there more to it?
The more and more you look into this ordeal, the more ties to the Democrats you will find.
Veselnitskaya had trouble getting into the country, the Obama administration let her in after her visa was blocked.
This is not to say you should be shocked in the slightest of the Obama administration acting like this, but it does beg the question, why?
Here she is sitting with Obama’s Ambassador to Russia, Michael McFaul, during a Foreign Affairs Committee hearing:
Keep in mind this was 8 days after contacting Trump Jr. in Trump Tower.
If we’re to believe that simply meeting with this women equals equals collusion, then the Obama Administration colluded openly!
She certainly fits in with the anti-Trump crowd, here’s a photo she posted on Facebook of Senator John McCain at a meeting from December 2015:
Natalia Veselnitskaya posted a pic from inside McCain’s office in Dec 2015 pic.twitter.com/tD7jD8olju
— Jack Posobiec ?? (@JackPosobiec) July 12, 2017
And make no mistake, Veselnitskaya herself was pro-Hillary and attended anti-Trump rallies.
Veselnitskaya’s chaperone was Ronald Dellums, the former mayor of Oakland, California and thirteen term member of the US House of Representatives.
Ron Dellums was also a major Hillary supporter. Dellums even backed Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama in 2007.
Veselnitskaya also worked on a case with the founder of Fusion GPS, a firm that produced a widely discredited dossier against Trump.
Have you put two and two together yet? She’s been working with the Democrats for years. It’s a little too convenient for her to frame Don Jr. for her cohorts.
Who is Veselnitskaya and what were her true intentions?
Is her meeting with Donald Trump Jr. really evidence of collusion with Russians? Or is she just a Clinton/Soros plant?
Still Zero Evidence of Russian Collusion
Senate intel officials agree that Russia “attempted to meddle” yet the “meddling” had no effect, especially on voting tallies.
I’m still in the camp that disagrees Russia meddled whatsoever. We simply haven’t seen any proof from the email server in question.
The original claim that 17 US intelligence groups agreed Russia hacked the election is simply bogus, and a very broad and ill-detailed claim. The NYT even had to redact this claim.
By simply following the evidence, Russia took no part in the 2016 election.
Lastly, it is important to remember that the Russian lawyer was brought to the United States by AG Lynch, which poses the question if Don Jr. was set up by Obama Admin officials.
If you’re worryingly watching Fox News wondering what Mueller will do next, keep in mind that Mueller isn’t investigating Trump, instead he’s investigating Russian involvement in our election.
Comey isn’t innocent here either.
He leaked classified documents to news agencies while and after being FBI director, something similar to Hillary Clinton’s crimes of intentionally mishandling classified documents as pertaining to the email server investigation.
President Trump has taken to Twitter calling this entire fiasco a “witch-hunt”. He’s right.
I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 16, 2017
If you’ve ever wondered whether this was a real investigation, just ask the DNC. Forensics on the “hacked” server were not allowed by the DNC when the FBI asked.
Yet the claim that Russia hacked the election is viewed as valid by the media. Imagine CSI’s not being able to access a crime scene yet know the cause of death. Unlikely.
Forensics of the files WikiLeaks published point to a local based download. Meaning someone with physical access to the server downloaded the emails.
Wikileaks has admitted that Guccifer 2.0 provided the emails. Guccifer 2.0 has stated that his source was named Seth and worked for the DNC.
Some call this a conspiracy theory, yet it hasn’t been investigated.
If the left and Dems want to call it a “fake theory”, I say prove it. Because besides that, they have zero proof of collusion.
The real fake theory is “Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election”.